The statement of work therefore usually contains a long list of target and target emergencies with detailed descriptions, diagrams and briefs of everything involved in the execution of the contract. In a sense, a SOW is no different from a Mil-Spec description. Instead of ordering standard and readily available paper clips, the government tells the contractor the size, weight, length, diameter, tensile strength, type of metal, color, number per box, number of strips on each clip itself, and . Well, you have the idea. Definition: “A Performance Statement of Work (EPW) is a statement of work for performance-based procurement that describes the required outcomes in clear, specific and objective terms with measurable outcomes.” A classic example is a grass cutting contract. The statement of work asks the contractor to use a lawn mower and weed killer and do this and that in a certain way. It contains specifications on what to mow, how to mow, when to mow, what equipment to use and how to use it, and how to use it, and how many people are needed in what capacity. A PWS simply tells the contractor that the grass needs to be maintained between 2 and 3 1/2 inches and how success will be measured. A PWS, on the other hand, is written with measurable standards that inform the entrepreneur of the desired results by the government.
How the entrepreneur achieves these results is up to him. The entrepreneur is thus empowered to use best business practices and his own innovative ideas to achieve the desired results. The PWS clearly describes the performance objectives and standards expected of the contractor. Completing the requirements roadmap provides the best structure for writing the PWS. The introduction and context provide an opportunity to describe the mission of the organization and how this requirement contributes to the overall success of the mission. There is no default template or plan for a PWS. The Federal Procurement Regulations only require agencies, where possible: Begins with an analytical process often referred to as “employment analysis.” This is an in-depth examination of the organization`s requirements and tends to be a “bottom-up” assessment with potential for “re-engineering”. This analysis is used as a basis for establishing performance requirements, developing performance standards, writing the performance statement and creating the quality assurance plan.
Those responsible for the mission or program are essential to perform the employment analysis. [1] According to the Fed`s website Acquisition.gov, the main difference between a sow and a statement of work (PWS) is that a tender statement is written to identify the assignment and specifically inform the contractor of how to do so. The SOO is a document prepared by the government that sets out the fundamental and overarching objectives of the acquisition. It is provided in the application instead of a written statement of the government`s performance work. In this approach, contractors` proposals include their service descriptions and performance measures and measures (based on proposed solutions). The use of an SOO opens up a wider range of solutions subject to solutions for acquisition. The PWS should generally specify the requirements of what (result) to do, not how (method) it is done. The PWS gives the entrepreneur maximum flexibility to develop the best method to achieve the required result. The PWS must be drafted in such a way that all suppliers compete on an equal footing. The U.S. government must remove all features that could limit a potential provider.
The Performance Statement of Work (EPW) is a statement of work for performance-based acquisitions that clearly describes the objectives and performance standards expected by the contractor. When a contract is awarded, the PWS is legally binding between the contractor and the U.S. government. . The Federal Procurement Regulations (FAR 37.602) only require agencies, where possible: Watch the video to discuss the key elements of a PWS and SOO. To create the actual PWS, it is best to use an established template from your organization or legal entity. Since you`ve already defined the task and content, it should be easy to include your content. A template also ensures that you answer all legal questions and that you don`t have any content. However, the PWS must also be sufficiently descriptive and specific to protect the interests of the U.S. government and promote competition.
The clarity and unambiguity of the requirements of the WPS will invariably improve the quality of the proposals submitted. A final PWS is likely to produce final proposals, reducing the time it takes to evaluate proposals. “Here`s what we want, and here`s how you`re going to deliver it.” . . . .
